Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Same sex unions may be as traditional as “traditional” marriage

A study to appear in the upcoming issue of the Journal of Modern History concludes that same sex civil unions existed in medieval Europe. Opponents of same sex marriage or civil unions have argued that such arrangements ran counter to “traditional” marriage of men and women heading nuclear family households. However, the study indicates there may be multiple traditions to draw upon.

This from Yahoo News:
Civil unions between male couples existed around 600 years ago in medieval Europe, a historian now says.

Historical evidence, including legal documents and gravesites, can be interpreted as supporting the prevalence of homosexual relationships hundreds of years ago, said Allan Tulchin of Shippensburg University in Pennsylvania.

If accurate, the results indicate socially sanctioned same-sex unions are nothing new, nor were they taboo in the past.

“Western family structures have been much more varied than many people today seem to realize," Tulchin writes in the September issue of the Journal of Modern History. "And Western legal systems have in the past made provisions for a variety of household structures.”

For example, he found legal contracts from late medieval France that referred to the term "affrèrement," roughly translated as brotherment. Similar contracts existed elsewhere in Mediterranean Europe, Tulchin said.

In the contract, the "brothers" pledged to live together sharing "un pain, un vin, et une bourse," (that's French for one bread, one wine and one purse). The "one purse" referred to the idea that all of the couple's goods became joint property. Like marriage contracts, the "brotherments" had to be sworn before a notary and witnesses, Tulchin explained.

The same type of legal contract of the time also could provide the foundation for a variety of non-nuclear households, including arrangements in which two or more biological brothers inherited the family home from their parents and would continue to live together, Tulchin said.

But non-relatives also used the contracts. In cases that involved single, unrelated men, Tulchin argues, these contracts provide “considerable evidence that the affrèrés were using affrèrements to formalize same-sex loving relationships."

The ins-and-outs of the medieval relationships are tricky at best to figure out.

"I suspect that some of these relationships were sexual, while others may not have been," Tulchin said. "It is impossible to prove either way and probably also somewhat irrelevant to understanding their way of thinking. They loved each other, and the community accepted that.”

2 comments:

Pupienus Maximus said...

It aint new. John Boswell, the Yale Professor and historian, wrote several thoroughly academic books on the subject 20 plus years ago.

Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality University of Chicago Press, 1980

and

Same-Sex Unions in Pre-Modern Europe, Villard, 1994

are the best known.

Scott Nolan said...

Also - marriages were not necessarily about love in the medieval world, but often had more to do with family connections and business or land inheritance.

There are numerous examples of marriages between gentry and even royal families where the duty of begetting heirs was clearly a chore to the participants.

Many of those who considered the begetting of heirs a chore may have been homosexual or anti-sexual.